Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince examines the type of ability and his views of ability in the leadership that he seen in his time. Machiavelli discusses vitality over the persons, dictatorial power, and the energy with the persons. The battle to retain, maintain, and apply one power is human nature which nature is usually agreeable with Aristotle's argument that "man is definitely a political animal." In The Prince, Machiavelli discusses two specific sets of people, the political elite, incorporating nobles and the general public. Machiavelli claims that ambition and dictatorial vitality drive virtually all nobles and princes. Because shared power is merely effective between your prince and his persons and not between your prince and the nobles as the persons depends on the prince and the prince requires his persons but since nobles and the prince are motivated by the same motivations shared vitality would be useless. "Whether guys bear affection is determined by themselves, but whether they are frightened will rely upon what the ruler will" (p.60-61).
While Machiavelli emphasizes ability over in relations between your political elite, he discusses a different sort of power in the partnership between a prince and the general public. Machiavelli notes a prnice can share power with the persons, since a prince can trust the persons much more than he can trust the nobles. Nobles" can't be satisfied if a ruler acts honorable however the persons could be thus satisfies, because their aims are considerably more honorable than those of the nobles happen to be for the latter only prefer to oppress and the ex - only really wants to avoid being oppressed" (p. 35). The persons aren't unforgiving and greedy so the prince can place even more trust in theapoio aprendiz